

This book examines how a mandatory UN oversight mechanism can influence State behaviour and legal reform in one of the world’s least studied regions. It reveals that the Human Rights Committee’s (hereafter: HRCtee) State reporting procedure is far more than a formal obligation: it operates as a sustained process of dialogue, persuasion, and normative pressure. By following the reporting cycles from the late Soviet era through the post-independence submissions of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan over nearly five decades, the monograph uncovers how the process has shaped domestic debate, made room for civil society engagement, and contributed to legislative and institutional change. Drawing on a combination of field research, documentary evidence, interviews with government officials, civil society activists and experts, as well as direct observation of HRCtee sessions, the book highlights both the visible — such as references to the Committee’s interpretation in legal acts — and more subtle forms of influence, including gradual shifts in discourse, expectations, and administrative practice. What distinguishes this book is its exclusive focus on the reporting mechanism itself, rather than the more frequently analysed individual complaints procedure. It shows how structured dialogue, interpretative guidance, and reputational incentives can lead to the gradual internalisation of norms, even in contexts marked by political sensitivity, limited transparency, and post-Soviet bureaucratic legacies. Spanning the USSR’s ratification of the ICCPR in 1973 to the contemporary engagement of the Central Asian states with the UN treaty body system, the volume traces a narrative of resistance, adaptation, and institutional learning. The book is intended for scholars, experts, practitioners, and policy actors interested in how international oversight influences domestic change, and offers practical insights for those seeking to engage with treaty bodies, strengthen domestic reforms, or assess the real-world effects of international human rights monitoring. Guljakhon Zafarovna Amanova holds a PhD in legal studies from the University of Cambridge, and is an independent human rights legal researcher focusing on Uzbekistan and Central Asia, based in Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Price now:
From
To
Price History:
Details:This book examines how a mandatory UN oversight mechanism can influence State behaviour and legal reform in one of the world’s least studied regions. It reveals that the Human Rights Committee’s (hereafter: HRCtee) State reporting procedure is far more than a formal obligation: it operates as a sustained process of dialogue, persuasion, and normative pressure. By following the reporting cycles from the late Soviet era through the post-independence submissions of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan over nearly five decades, the monograph uncovers how the process has shaped domestic debate, made room for civil society engagement, and contributed to legislative and institutional change. Drawing on a combination of field research, documentary evidence, interviews with government officials, civil society activists and experts, as well as direct observation of HRCtee sessions, the book highlights both the visible — such as references to the Committee’s interpretation in legal acts — and more subtle forms of influence, including gradual shifts in discourse, expectations, and administrative practice. What distinguishes this book is its exclusive focus on the reporting mechanism itself, rather than the more frequently analysed individual complaints procedure. It shows how structured dialogue, interpretative guidance, and reputational incentives can lead to the gradual internalisation of norms, even in contexts marked by political sensitivity, limited transparency, and post-Soviet bureaucratic legacies. Spanning the USSR’s ratification of the ICCPR in 1973 to the contemporary engagement of the Central Asian states with the UN treaty body system, the volume traces a narrative of resistance, adaptation, and institutional learning. The book is intended for scholars, experts, practitioners, and policy actors interested in how international oversight influences domestic change, and offers practical insights for those seeking to engage with treaty bodies, strengthen domestic reforms, or assess the real-world effects of international human rights monitoring. Guljakhon Zafarovna Amanova holds a PhD in legal studies from the University of Cambridge, and is an independent human rights legal researcher focusing on Uzbekistan and Central Asia, based in Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Price now:
From
To
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.
eBay
New
£98.42
£119.99
Springer Nature Link Shop
0.00% (~ £0.00)
New
£119.99
This book examines how a mandatory UN oversight mechanism can influence State behaviour and legal reform in one of the world’s least studied regions. It reveals that the Human Rights Committee’s (hereafter: HRCtee) State reporting procedure is far more than a formal obligation: it operates as a sustained process of dialogue, persuasion, and normative pressure. By following the reporting cycles from the late Soviet era through the post-independence submissions of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan over nearly five decades, the monograph uncovers how the process has shaped domestic debate, made room for civil society engagement, and contributed to legislative and institutional change. Drawing on a combination of field research, documentary evidence, interviews with government officials, civil society activists and experts, as well as direct observation of HRCtee sessions, the book highlights both the visible — such as references to the Committee’s interpretation in legal acts — and more subtle forms of influence, including gradual shifts in discourse, expectations, and administrative practice. What distinguishes this book is its exclusive focus on the reporting mechanism itself, rather than the more frequently analysed individual complaints procedure. It shows how structured dialogue, interpretative guidance, and reputational incentives can lead to the gradual internalisation of norms, even in contexts marked by political sensitivity, limited transparency, and post-Soviet bureaucratic legacies. Spanning the USSR’s ratification of the ICCPR in 1973 to the contemporary engagement of the Central Asian states with the UN treaty body system, the volume traces a narrative of resistance, adaptation, and institutional learning. The book is intended for scholars, experts, practitioners, and policy actors interested in how international oversight influences domestic change, and offers practical insights for those seeking to engage with treaty bodies, strengthen domestic reforms, or assess the real-world effects of international human rights monitoring. Guljakhon Zafarovna Amanova holds a PhD in legal studies from the University of Cambridge, and is an independent human rights legal researcher focusing on Uzbekistan and Central Asia, based in Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
General | |
|---|---|
format | hardcover |
Language | english |
type | textbook |
Material | lead |
Brand | T.M.C. Asser Press |
Sellers offer a range of delivery options, so you can choose the one that’s most convenient for you. Many sellers offer free delivery. You can always find the postage cost and estimated delivery date in a seller’s listing. You'll then be able to see a full list of delivery options during checkout. These can include: Express delivery, Standard delivery, Economy delivery, Click & Collect, Free local collection from seller.
Your options for returning an item vary depending on what you want to return, why you want to return it, and the seller's return policy. If the item is damaged or doesn't match the listing description, you can return it even if the seller's returns policy says they don't accept returns. If you've changed your mind and no longer want an item, you can still request a return, but the seller doesn't have to accept it. If the buyer changes their mind about a purchase and wants to return an item, they may need to pay return postage costs, depending on the seller's return policy. Sellers can provide a return postage address and additional return postage information for the buyer. Sellers pay for return postage if there's a problem with the item. For example, if the item doesn't match the listing description, is damaged or defective or is counterfeit. By law, customers in the European Union also have the right to cancel the purchase of an item within 14 days beginning from the day you receive, or a third party indicated by you (other than the carrier) receives, the last good ordered by you (if delivered separately). This applies to all products except for digital items (e.g. Digital Music) that are provided immediately to you with your acknowledgement, and other items such as video, DVD, audio, video games, Sex and Sensuality products and software products where the item has been unsealed.
Sellers have to offer a refund for certain items only if they are faulty, such as: Personalised items and custom-made items, Perishable items, Newspapers and magazines, Unwrapped CDs DVDs and computer software. If you used your PayPal balance or bank account to fund the original payment, the refunded money will go back to your PayPal account balance. If you used a credit or debit card to fund the original payment, the refunded money will go back to your card. The seller will effect the refund within three working days but it may take up to 30 days for Paypal to process the transfer. For payments funded partially by a card and partially by your balance/bank, the money taken from your card will go back to your card and the remainder will return to your PayPal balance.